https://minesweeper.us/forum/ Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:28:27 +0000 MyBB https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-190.html Tue, 06 Jan 2026 23:51:33 +0100 HogTenrec]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-190.html
  Colors.png (Size: 55.07 KB / Downloads: 4)

Before you blame me, I even told my sister not to touch the keyboard (note that I'm playing the Portuguese version, it's my native language so I prefer it).]]>
  Colors.png (Size: 55.07 KB / Downloads: 4)

Before you blame me, I even told my sister not to touch the keyboard (note that I'm playing the Portuguese version, it's my native language so I prefer it).]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-110.html Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:44:56 +0200 Erendis42]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-110.html
I just thought that the solvability of games with a specific number in predefined difficulties could be stored in a lookup table on the server side (for Pure Intellect game mode).


Kind Regards,
Erendis42]]>
I just thought that the solvability of games with a specific number in predefined difficulties could be stored in a lookup table on the server side (for Pure Intellect game mode).


Kind Regards,
Erendis42]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-72.html Fri, 03 Nov 2023 18:22:55 +0100 MegaField_MegaMine]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-72.html You might argue that no one's gonna play with a board that large anyways, and if that's the case, then why bother allowing people to make boards that contain 250000 tiles in the first place? If you're gonna implement something, at least do it properly.
I tried downscaling the map and make the mine density 30% on no guess mode and it works just fine.]]> You might argue that no one's gonna play with a board that large anyways, and if that's the case, then why bother allowing people to make boards that contain 250000 tiles in the first place? If you're gonna implement something, at least do it properly.
I tried downscaling the map and make the mine density 30% on no guess mode and it works just fine.]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-61.html Fri, 26 May 2023 23:44:16 +0200 Wawis]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-61.html
  Captura de Pantalla 2023-05-26 a la(s) 3.29.03 p.m..png (Size: 112.15 KB / Downloads: 14)

  Captura de Pantalla 2023-05-26 a la(s) 3.19.23 p.m..png (Size: 140.02 KB / Downloads: 13) ]]>
  Captura de Pantalla 2023-05-26 a la(s) 3.29.03 p.m..png (Size: 112.15 KB / Downloads: 14)

  Captura de Pantalla 2023-05-26 a la(s) 3.19.23 p.m..png (Size: 140.02 KB / Downloads: 13) ]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-14.html Wed, 04 Jan 2023 16:50:57 +0100 konstantin-e4]]> https://minesweeper.us/forum/thread-14.html
I have noticed that 2's do not behave logically. Minesweeper is an intellectual's game, as you and I both know. Each square - each individual piece of the puzzle - can be deduced through logic. What I am saying is that a dog could do this with his ears over his eyes (provided he was trained in Minesweeper logic). For example, if I see a 1, I will know that there is only 1 mine next to it. A 3 - 3 mines, and so on and so forth. Hopefully you are still following along. The problem is that whenever I see a 2, there is either the incorrect application of Minesweeper logic or no logic at all. Not to say that I have ever had to guess on a 2, as our beautiful website has eliminated guessing. But 2's just don't really work out. One time, I got a 2 on a God board. Well, that means 2 mines next to it, right? Wrong! Wrong, my dear. Once I had fully solved the gargantuan board (which took me not a second over six hours, if anyone was asking), I went back to this 2 and noticed that it had 3 flags next to it...but the board was completely solved! Get what I'm saying? I thought that this was because God was too big of a board to correctly render 2's. No, no! I tried later on beginner, intermediate, expert, even custom boards -- every God-forsaken board under the sun, I tried! But to no avail -- and I was always seeing problems with these 2's. They would sometimes have 3 bombs next to them, maybe 1 bomb...I swear, I had one with 6 bombs next to it at some point! And this is just simply outrageous...how could we allow this to happen? We are the cream of the crop, the yummiest pieces of the pie, the juiciest apples in the orchard...we are on top of the world's hierarchy. We play chess as they play checkers. We play Texas Hold'em as they play War. Basically, do you get what I'm saying? We are too smart to allow this to happen, and this WILL NOT continue further. I kneel in front of you, administrators of minesweeper.us. I have devoted my life's work to games of genius as this one, and I ask for one thing in return. We must team up against the 2's. I haven't much IT experience, but I took an online class in Javascript on Khan Academy over the pandemic, and I draw a mean rectangle. This can't be too hard of a problem to solve. Nothing is too difficult, nothing will take too long, nothing -- nothing! -- will conquer the people of minesweeper.us. We will end the 2's and the corruption they bring with them, if it costs us our lives. God bless you all, let's get on this swiftly. Ad Astra!]]>
I have noticed that 2's do not behave logically. Minesweeper is an intellectual's game, as you and I both know. Each square - each individual piece of the puzzle - can be deduced through logic. What I am saying is that a dog could do this with his ears over his eyes (provided he was trained in Minesweeper logic). For example, if I see a 1, I will know that there is only 1 mine next to it. A 3 - 3 mines, and so on and so forth. Hopefully you are still following along. The problem is that whenever I see a 2, there is either the incorrect application of Minesweeper logic or no logic at all. Not to say that I have ever had to guess on a 2, as our beautiful website has eliminated guessing. But 2's just don't really work out. One time, I got a 2 on a God board. Well, that means 2 mines next to it, right? Wrong! Wrong, my dear. Once I had fully solved the gargantuan board (which took me not a second over six hours, if anyone was asking), I went back to this 2 and noticed that it had 3 flags next to it...but the board was completely solved! Get what I'm saying? I thought that this was because God was too big of a board to correctly render 2's. No, no! I tried later on beginner, intermediate, expert, even custom boards -- every God-forsaken board under the sun, I tried! But to no avail -- and I was always seeing problems with these 2's. They would sometimes have 3 bombs next to them, maybe 1 bomb...I swear, I had one with 6 bombs next to it at some point! And this is just simply outrageous...how could we allow this to happen? We are the cream of the crop, the yummiest pieces of the pie, the juiciest apples in the orchard...we are on top of the world's hierarchy. We play chess as they play checkers. We play Texas Hold'em as they play War. Basically, do you get what I'm saying? We are too smart to allow this to happen, and this WILL NOT continue further. I kneel in front of you, administrators of minesweeper.us. I have devoted my life's work to games of genius as this one, and I ask for one thing in return. We must team up against the 2's. I haven't much IT experience, but I took an online class in Javascript on Khan Academy over the pandemic, and I draw a mean rectangle. This can't be too hard of a problem to solve. Nothing is too difficult, nothing will take too long, nothing -- nothing! -- will conquer the people of minesweeper.us. We will end the 2's and the corruption they bring with them, if it costs us our lives. God bless you all, let's get on this swiftly. Ad Astra!]]>